| Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? | |
|
+7Dirty Diana deena truthmj062509 lovemjangel CrimsonRaine achillesara Captain_EO 11 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Captain_EO
Posts : 1392 Join date : 2010-03-12 Age : 31 Location : England, UK
| Subject: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:41 pm | |
| Again I have to thank the 'Michael Jackson's Believers' group on facebook for this find! You guys have got to read this! http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s4i76940I don't know whether to believe this or not considering the name of the site it is on but it's still worth a read! L.O.V.E | |
|
| |
Captain_EO
Posts : 1392 Join date : 2010-03-12 Age : 31 Location : England, UK
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:43 pm | |
| Underneath what is written on that site it says something like 'the above is totally fictitious' but i remember reading somewhere that it may well have been E'Casanova that took Michael's place in the autopsy room! So this artical may well be true...who knows?
L.O.V.E | |
|
| |
achillesara
Posts : 258 Join date : 2010-03-12
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:49 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
CrimsonRaine
Posts : 16 Join date : 2010-06-19 Location : Good ole Blighty
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:53 pm | |
| Quite possibly E'Casanova because nobody has seen or heard of him since. Hmm makes you wonder though though was the replacement | |
|
| |
Captain_EO
Posts : 1392 Join date : 2010-03-12 Age : 31 Location : England, UK
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:54 pm | |
| - Bazylrei wrote:
- wasnt MJ bald?
Not completely i don't think, but then again his hair still would have been too short to get DNA from right? Like i say I don't know whether to believe this or not lol L.O.V.E | |
|
| |
lovemjangel
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-04-07 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:06 pm | |
| - CrimsonRaine wrote:
- Quite possibly E'Casanova because nobody has seen or heard of him since.
I'm sorry, but's thats not true, he was at MJ's memorial... Btw, interesting article! Welcome to this forum and our 'family' | |
|
| |
CrimsonRaine
Posts : 16 Join date : 2010-06-19 Location : Good ole Blighty
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:13 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
lovemjangel
Posts : 366 Join date : 2010-04-07 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:21 pm | |
| You're welcome, CrimsonRaine This site, "The Spoof" - doe's anyone know if all articles are fake/fiction? I found an article that caught my eye: http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s4i75149It's about someone called Honus Snell, who's obviously imitating Michaels voice and selling tapes... have you heard of this person before?? | |
|
| |
CrimsonRaine
Posts : 16 Join date : 2010-06-19 Location : Good ole Blighty
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:25 pm | |
| Not heard of that guy but I did watch a video not too long ago with these teenagers and one of them sounded somewhat like MJ. | |
|
| |
truthmj062509
Posts : 309 Join date : 2010-06-16 Age : 34 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sat Jun 19, 2010 7:25 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
deena
Posts : 139 Join date : 2010-05-20 Age : 65 Location : The Sunshine State
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:42 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Dirty Diana
Posts : 1796 Join date : 2010-03-13 Age : 27 Location : somewhere in your mind
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:17 am | |
| That picture is kinda weird.Also it was taken when on the screen was written "I'm alive and I'm here forever".And about the autopsy...hmmm...you know that on the report was written: "Michael JOSEPH Jackson" and not "JOE"===> They want to tell us that his real name ISN'T Joseph? (this may be a possibility) | |
|
| |
BehindTheMask
Posts : 612 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 65 Location : The whole World
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:28 am | |
| Okay guys.. Time to get realistic, please. E'cassanova is not dead. Michael would NEVER use a body to someone else, to plan his own death hoax. -Then it was his plan for 10 years that E'casanova had to die, or someone else? I think that article is fake. First of all, everyone can see whether it is Michael Jackson lying on the table or not, if you're not blind.. Using someones body, who is identical to MJ, that doesn't even exist, except for Navi & E'casanova.. Who are 100% alive. (1% in Uri-language ) MJ was reported bald, when he came in.. MJ was not bald, because then it PROVES 100% that ambulance photo is fake, or MJ was wearing a wig in This Is It. MJ is alive, no autopsy was completed. Only a creator himself behind the scene, writing what the results should be. | |
|
| |
Dirty Diana
Posts : 1796 Join date : 2010-03-13 Age : 27 Location : somewhere in your mind
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:17 am | |
| Ok...I agree with Tom.Michael was on the ambulance,for sure (on the fake photo) | |
|
| |
missingmj
Posts : 4 Join date : 2010-04-15
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:27 pm | |
| - NortheNtoM wrote:
- Okay guys.. Time to get realistic, please.
E'cassanova is not dead. Michael would NEVER use a body to someone else, to plan his own death hoax. -Then it was his plan for 10 years that E'casanova had to die, or someone else?
I think that article is fake. First of all, everyone can see whether it is Michael Jackson lying on the table or not, if you're not blind.. Using someones body, who is identical to MJ, that doesn't even exist, except for Navi & E'casanova.. Who are 100% alive. (1% in Uri-language ) MJ was reported bald, when he came in.. MJ was not bald, because then it PROVES 100% that ambulance photo is fake, or MJ was wearing a wig in This Is It.
MJ is alive, no autopsy was completed. Only a creator himself behind the scene, writing what the results should be. I agree.MJ wouldn't do anything like that. | |
|
| |
CrimsonRaine
Posts : 16 Join date : 2010-06-19 Location : Good ole Blighty
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:42 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
BehindTheMask
Posts : 612 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 65 Location : The whole World
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:48 pm | |
| Ah.. He is not talking about the ambulance photo itself, but 0:07 intro.. Check it out, lol. | |
|
| |
truthmj062509
Posts : 309 Join date : 2010-06-16 Age : 34 Location : USA
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:06 pm | |
| yes but people never thought he would fake his own death which he clearly did... | |
|
| |
CrimsonRaine
Posts : 16 Join date : 2010-06-19 Location : Good ole Blighty
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:02 pm | |
| - NortheNtoM wrote:
- Ah.. He is not talking about the ambulance photo itself, but 0:07 intro.. Check it out, lol.
I know but why use E'Cas's pic | |
|
| |
BehindTheMask
Posts : 612 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 65 Location : The whole World
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:43 am | |
| Because media is so stupid that they can't see the difference.
Or maybe it was E'casanova who died, but changed name to Michael Jackson.. lol, don't ask me.. I believe in the first one... Media doesnt know so much. | |
|
| |
nancydoodle
Posts : 203 Join date : 2010-05-27 Age : 33 Location : Houston
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:03 pm | |
| The thing is the person in the autopsy was not Michael since there were some fake autopsy reports and mj was not bold at all it was probably part of the story for a cover up of the hoax who knows but if it was really michael in that autopsy why the fake reports and inconcitencies of the stories relating tio his death and death certificates? | |
|
| |
achillesara
Posts : 258 Join date : 2010-03-12
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:11 pm | |
| the autopsy in my oppinion was totally fake:
1. wrong name 2. wrong date 3. most probably wrong person or none at all
And yeah I think he was actually bald... how and why would he keep changing curly hair-staight hair? Somebody said that he had curly hair all along, he just put the straight wig on top. But how would the straight ones look so natural since the original ones would make a mald or something on top of his head | |
|
| |
BehindTheMask
Posts : 612 Join date : 2010-04-05 Age : 65 Location : The whole World
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:14 pm | |
| It was definitely MJs real hair in This Is It..
MJ has money to get a comfortable wig, that can have real hair inside.
His wig is like a mask. | |
|
| |
nancydoodle
Posts : 203 Join date : 2010-05-27 Age : 33 Location : Houston
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:19 pm | |
| - Bazylrei wrote:
- the autopsy in my oppinion was totally fake:
1. wrong name 2. wrong date 3. most probably wrong person or none at all
And yeah I think he was actually bald... how and why would he keep changing curly hair-staight hair? Somebody said that he had curly hair all along, he just put the straight wig on top. But how would the straight ones look so natural since the original ones would make a mald or something on top of his head MJ is not bold lol I have the same hair as he does and I can go from curly to straight it's very simple lol | |
|
| |
Captain_EO
Posts : 1392 Join date : 2010-03-12 Age : 31 Location : England, UK
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:22 pm | |
| - nancydoodle wrote:
- MJ is not bold lol I have the same hair as he does and I can go from curly to straight it's very simple lol
But when he got burnt whilst doing the pepsi commerical didn't he get 3rd degree burns on the top of his head? So he only had some places that were bald? L.O.V.E | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? | |
| |
|
| |
| Not Michael Jackson in the autopsy!? | |
|