DID U GUYS SEE THIS????

WATCH THIS VIDEO PLEASE, IF U HAVE NOT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaMELwMDzGs&feature=feedu

Hi. Thanks for the video. I have looked at me with big Interresse.
Best regards Manu

.
Thanks for sharing teo, the bits that interested me were "Janet dressed as a guy"@ that point I was one step ahead with the Michael wearing womens clothes, maybe its a little inside joke between Michael and Janet at medias exspence for when they accused Michael and Janet of being the same person & perhapps let us believers to keep our eyes open because Michael could be disguised as either gender, the Murray hatman tie intrigued me too, it's that kind of detail that only us believers would give any significance.

Rogerrabbit wrote:

.
perhapps let us believers to keep our eyes open because Michael could be disguised as either gender.

and even make us think twice about the blonde lady at staples center

Yes exactly , it makes me question if we missed something else around time of the memorial as we were all looking for a guy after hatman I'm more convinced by the blonde lady than the hatman, seeing the imposible or the unexpected is a interesting topic in fact I was discussing that yesterday and how we have a blindness to it for example a test was carried out on trainee pilots on a flight simulator 80% of the trainee pilots failed to see a plane on the runway while coming in to land another test people were asked to watch a video and count the number of times the ball was passed in the video at the end most people got it right but when asked did they noticed anything odd in the video most didn't,even though there was a guy in the video in a monkey suit, so we may not see everything even if we are looking but with so many eyes and clues no stone should be unturned this is all for love.

i totally agree

Rogerrabbit wrote:

I'm more convinced by the blonde lady than the hatman,

I wonder if 'Hatman' was at the memorial to distract us and divert our attention AWAY from the blonde lady then?

L.O.V.E

Captain_EO wrote:

Rogerrabbit wrote:

I'm more convinced by the blonde lady than the hatman,

I wonder if 'Hatman' was at the memorial to distract us and divert our attention AWAY from the blonde lady then?

L.O.V.E

Well, I personally think the Hatman WAS MJ, and maybe MJ had an impersonator disguise themself as the blonde lady, to make us wonder what is REALLY true and what is fake. Plus, while the blonde lady did have an Adam's apple, the Hatman had more qualities of MJ than the lady did.

daemon.trances wrote:

Well, I personally think the Hatman WAS MJ, and maybe MJ had an impersonator disguise themself as the blonde lady, to make us wonder what is REALLY true and what is fake. Plus, while the blonde lady did have an Adam's apple, the Hatman had more qualities of MJ than the lady did.

Yeah I am more convinced by Hatman too...was the blonde lady at the funeral like hatman was?

L.O.V.E

im sure MJ was the hatman
but u still cant be soo sure because we also think MJ was the blonde lady

@ Captain Eo Suppose it was all a bit retrospective, i think we first became aware of the hatman at the funeral or at least i did so we failed to see him first time round at memorial, then eagle eyed investigators looked back and spotted the famous hatman at the memorial dressed the same but looking different so immediate our attention was drawn to him unawares of the Blonde lady or depending on your perspective drawn towards the blonde lady aswell, so it was back to front for me, Maura mentioned the back to frontness in her old videos, I think michael sees his visions and goals first then sets ground work backwards to acheive it, pure genius, we need michael back to explain this enigma because as I fear no conspiracy theorist will ever be able to explain this not in a million years This is all for love.

@ Daemon trances that is the brilliance of Michael Jackson he's managed to hoodwink the fans aswell becuase we can't agree which disguised person was him or even if he appeared at the o2 or if he had doubles in this is it, everyones got their own opinions who was michael or was it michael and don't forget mr magoo at the Grammys btw cool avatar. This is all for love

Rogerrabbit wrote:

@ Captain Eo Suppose it was all a bit retrospective, i think we first became aware of the hatman at the funeral or at least i did so we failed to see him first time round at memorial, then eagle eyed investigators looked back and spotted the famous hatman at the memorial dressed the same but looking different so immediate our attention was drawn to him unawares of the Blonde lady or depending on your perspective drawn towards the blonde lady aswell, so it was back to front for me, Maura mentioned the back to frontness in her old videos, I think michael sees his visions and goals first then sets ground work backwards to acheive it, pure genius, we need michael back to explain this enigma because as I fear no conspiracy theorist will ever be able to explain this not in a million years This is all for love.

Oh yeah you may be right! I remember a while back someone here mentioned that the hoax was like a mirror because some things seems reversed, like the leachim videos and so on...Kinda reminds me of this:

'Can the heart reveal the proof
Like a mirror reveals the truth'

L.O.V.E

Yes very much soo or at least from my Prospective, attention to hatman started at the funeral so attention moved backwards to the memorial so I guess reversed/backwards, then murray's tie going back to hatmans tie so I wonder if every clue comes in at least Pairs and in reverse if you understand?, lol it all reminds me a little bit like a sequence from 80's classic back to the future or something lol. This is all For love.

Rogerrabbit wrote:

Yes very much soo or at least from my Prospective, attention to hatman started at the funeral so attention moved backwards to the memorial so I guess reversed/backwards, then murray's tie going back to hatmans tie so I wonder if every clue comes in at least Pairs and in reverse if you understand?, lol it all reminds me a little bit like a sequence from 80's classic back to the future or something lol. This is all For love.

Yeah I understand what you mean

L.O.V.E

I believe the blonde is Michael too. I read a post on another forum about Liz Taylor happened to be sitting next to a blonde at the Glendale funeral. I decided to research that by looking for pics of Liz at the funeral. The ONLY picture I can find is of Liz looking into the blonde's eyes, smiling, as if being reasured that everything is okay. But the blonde's face and facial features are covered by "her" hair. My guess is all the other photos of Liz have been removed.

crystaldanae87 wrote:

I believe the blonde is Michael too. I read a post on another forum about Liz Taylor happened to be sitting next to a blonde at the Glendale funeral. I decided to research that by looking for pics of Liz at the funeral. The ONLY picture I can find is of Liz looking into the blonde's eyes, smiling, as if being reasured that everything is okay. But the blonde's face and facial features are covered by "her" hair. My guess is all the other photos of Liz have been removed.

So the blonde lady WAS at the funeral?! I couldn't see her anywhere

L.O.V.E

Liz Taylor was in remarkably high spirits all things considered, imo Michael was alive on national tv the day of funeral as Dave Dave, that said he couldn't be in 2 places at once also  2 full disguises in one day might be pushing it unless he made a late show at the funeral.

There had been suggestion that green screen was used at the funeral, lets suppose that was the case, now what if we reverse that techique but instead of super imposing objects into the scene they super impose objects out, for example if michael had worn green he would still be visable to the mourners but invisable to the camera, it's only an idea but remember the "green man"  these clues appear to come in pairs, It's all for love